Bad Theater in a time of crisis

I was listening to Alternative Radio the other night, and I heard Richard Wolff's talk entitled "Capitalism Hits the Fan." It disturbed me more than anything I've read in a long time, so I purchased the transcript, and I'd like to share a little of it on this blog. If you'd like to purchase a copy for yourself, here is the link: http://www.capitalismhitsthefan.com/
Richard Wolff is a Professor of Economics Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst.
I'm just going to point out some of the highlights, but listen to the entire talk, its worth the time investment, and the transcript cost me $4.00 from the Alternative Radio Site:
--U-6, an employment statistic that the Bureau of Labor Statistics keeps, which measures not only the unemployed, but those who are working part time but want full time work and those who have stopped looking, is at 17.5%s or one out of six in the U.S., between 20 and 30 million.
--Currently, the government says we are working at about 70% capacity, meaning 30% of the tools, equipment, machines, office space, mall space is sitting empty, idle.
--30 Years ago, the U.S. was one of the least unequal societies in terms of the distribution of income and wealth, now we are the most unequal.
--Between 1934 and 1941, FDR and the federal government created and filled 11 million jobs, paid by taxing corporations, which used to pay $1.50 for every dollar collected from individuals and the wealthy, who used to be taxed at rates as high as 90%.
--Last year, when Obama tried to end the Bush era tax cuts, the debate was about raising the tax rate on the wealthiest from 35% to 39%, and it was defeated.
--While there are plenty of places to throw blame, Wolff points the finger at Capitalism itself, which, by nature is highly unstable.
--The current federal budget, voted on by both democrats and republicans, shows the government spending $3 1/2 trillion and bringing in taxes on individuals and corporations of $2 trillion. The difference in what we plan to spend and take in is $1 1/2 trillion, which is $ 1,500 Billion, which is our deficit for ONE YEAR.
--The Republicans entered the budget debate saying they wanted to slash the deficit by $100 billion. The democrats said that is too much, we can only trim it by $30 billion.
--When you compare the true size of the deficit ($1,500 billion) with the debate about reducing it between $100 and 30 billion, you see that the debates were as Richard Wolff describes, nothing more than "bad political theater."
--The way to reduce our deficit is to tax the wealth. That is the answer.
--The way to change the system long term is to change the way corporations are organized, from merely protecting the needs of the shareholders to looking after all of the employees of the organization as well.
Employee owned organizations seem to be the most logical answer to this problem, but that's my own two cents worth, and I am not an economist. What I do know is that the system is broken, and until we as a society own up to that, we are living in denial, which means we will continue to be unable to face the disease called capitalism. I'm ready to pull my head out of the sand, what about you?

Life is NOT a TV show (or is it?)

I was on the bus this afternoon when I witnessed the following series of events. A disabled man with a walker boarded the bus and then sat down. A woman sitting next to the disabled man suggested that a woman sitting across the aisle move to make more room for him. As the man got up to move to the other side of the bus, the bus started rolling and the man fell. I and another passenger caught him on the way down and he landed fairly softly. As we were helping him get back in his seat, the woman who had suggested for him to move started yelling that the bus driver shouldn't have taken off when she did. A middle aged man came to the bus drivers defense and got into an exchange with the woman who was being critical of the bus driver. I'm not going to take sides about what happened next. I don't think either person communicated very well.

The woman who was critical of the bus driver said to the middle aged man at one point, "I don't know why you are telling me this and you'd better get out of my face." The man made an unkind counter remark and went a few rows back to sit down. The bus driver gave the man who had fallen down a piece of paper and asked him to write his name and phone number down so that someone from the transit company could follow up with him. It was at this point that the middle aged man who had intervened earlier decided to re-engage with the woman who was being critical, and things went from being tense to violent. After a hostile exchange, the man called the woman a sociopath and the woman called the man out for a fight. When he did not take her up on it, she spit in his face twice. The bus driver asked the woman to leave, and as she was leaving the bus she continued to hurl insults at the man, question his manhood and challenge him to a fight. She finally got off the bus as the driver called the Transit Police.

There is a TV show in its first season that is called "Fairly Legal." The star is a beautiful young mediator who, when she is not mediating high stakes legal issues intervenes when she sees people on the street who are about to get into a conflict. She solves an issue between a bicyclist and a driver and also (the most far fetched) between an armed man and a convenience store clerk. For the bicyclist and motorist, she chided both of them for focusing more on drinking their coffee than watching traffic and sent them on their way. For the clerk and the would be robber, she led them through a quick negotiation and reality tested what might happen to each of them if they fail to resolve the conflict. I have to say that I was not thinking of the fact that I was a mediator as I watched the two people I described earlier argue on the bus. I was watching the trajectory of the young woman's spit and trying to stay clear of it. I was also watching the way the man was trying to shame the woman into seeing the error of her ways and how this approach was failing. Could this issue be mediated? I don't think so. Mediation, at least the model that I have been trained under, doesn't fit into scenarios like this one when people aren't really playing by any rules. Mediators are all about rules. We suggest where people sit and make them agree to all sorts of things, such as one person talking at a time, not using "hot button" words etc., and usually have them agree to these rules and the confidentiality of the process before anyone says a word.

I don't think we should scrap the eight stage interest based mediation model. It works well, especially in work place mediation. I am becoming more aware of the model's limitations though. If mediators really want to make a difference in the world, and I think we do, we need to look at models that can help us intervene when people are out of control and not able to play by the rules. I'm not sure what these new models might look like, but it is an interesting question to ponder, don't you think?

Tax the Super Rich or Face A Revolution?

I'm sharing a story I read on Market Watch. Mind you this is not a lefty website, nor is the author. He's an "insider" trying to get people's attention. I think he may be on to something. History will tell.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tax-the-super-rich-now-or-face-a-revolution-2011-03-29

The Ten Commandments of Social Networking

1- Thou shalt not treat Facebook as your God. Facebook has received a tremendous amount of press, but it is still essentially a way for people to share pictures.

2- Thou shalt not believe everything you read online. Case in point, networks announced that Representative Gifford's was fatally wounded based upon an anonymous source on Wikipedia. The thing that is great about the internet, access for all, also makes it quite likely that you will occasionally read something that is totally nonsense, such as a Twitter feed from Sarah Palin. Likewise, don't assume you know someone if the only impression you have of them comes from what they post online. The person is letting you see the parts of them they want, sort of like an iceberg, much more is below the surface.

3- Thou shalt not take thy spouse or bosses name in vain online. The same norms of social etiquette that have applied to people for ages apply to your online posts. If you are mad at your boss or your ex-lover, tell it to a few close friends if you must, but don't post it online. It's sort of like Eddie Vedder getting drunk and getting on the mike at a Baseball stadium. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

4- Remember the sabbath- Once a week, turn off your phone, computer, etc. and take a walk. See the sky, the trees? Smell the air? See that cute guy/girl on the bus who isn't listening to his/her Ipod or texting on his/her smart phone? Strike up a conversation. Sure it feels weird for a bit, but isn't it ten times more interesting than anything you've read online for the last, say 2 years? You know it is.

5- Honor thy father and mother. Remember when you friended your Mom on Facebook? Remember that post you just made on FB "got real drunk last night and masturbated to pictures of your mom?" Your mom and your Grandmother just read that.

6- Thou shall not murder your career. It's nice that you have a cool job where you can get drunk at work. It's fun to post pictures of you using a beer bong in front of your work computer. A small disturbed sub-group of your friends are thinking about following you on Twitter. Even if you delete it later, it lives on a server somewhere forever, and it can come back to haunt you. Do you think this is going to be your last job? Do you think potential employers might do a Google search on your name? What if drinking at work is not so OK with them? Go ahead, roll the dice.

7-Thou shalt no commit adultry (even if its all in your mind). If you are married or in a committed relationship, don't say anything in a chat or private message that you wouldn't post on a wall on FB. If the message you are getting ready to send to your daughters hot friend does not pass this test, stand up, back away from the computer and do 25 sit ups. It can never hurt.

8- Thou shalt not steal intellectual property. If someone has blogged it, played it, painted it, drew it, or twittered it, it's their property. You can probably get away with using that photo you like on your album cover if you photo shop the shit out of it, but don't use it unless you get permission. See the last sentence of commandment three for the reason.

9-Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. This means don't lie. It's just a good rule to follow. Enough said?

10- Do not covet thy neighbors online Friends. I saw a presentation about Social Networking sites which stated you cannot keep meaningful contact up with more than 150 people, nobody can. If you think this is overstated, try this test. Take a look at your list of Friends on any social networking site. Now, ask yourself this question, how many of these people would pick me up at the airport if I asked them? Those are your friends.***

***Paraphrased from something I heard Chuck Prophet say at a show at the Tractor Tavern in 2010 (see Commandment #8)